UNITED NATIONS
LAWSUIT
United States of Enotita
vs
State of Israel
31 December 2023
Justification for Lawsuit
• When Israel gained independence in 1948, the United Nations proposed for two states – one Jewish
(Israel) and one Arab (Palestine).
• The recognition of the State of Kosovo by Israel means that Israel believes that the Kosovar people have the right to self-determination. So, Palestine does too, right?
• The British allowed for a Jewish state in what was then British Palestine under one condition – that the rights of Palestinian Arabs would be respected. This was violated.
Chancellor Rafael Mercado
State of Israel – Response
• You must note that the United Nations’ proposal in 1948 was prior to the Arab Israeli War of 1967. Thus, after winning the war, the Arabs had lost the right to self-determination in Palestine.
• The difference is that Palestine is operated by the terrorist organization of Hamas, as opposed to Kosovo.
• The Arabs rejected the British offer of two states by the British.
Israeli Court of Justice
United States of Enotita – Response
• It is a violation of international law to suppress an ethnic group just because you defeated them in a war.
• Hamas is not the entire Palestine. That is like saying that all Germans are Nazis. In fact, the other part of
Palestine, West Bank, is not even controlled by Hamas.
• If you are supporting an Arab decision, why are you suppressing them?
Chancellor Rafael Mercado
State of Israel – Response
• Effective today, the State of Israel surrenders to United States of Enotita. We find their arguments just and our points false.
Israeli Court of Justice
United States of Enotita and State of Israel - Agreement
These are the surrender terms.
• Israel must stop fighting with the State of Palestine.
• They must also recognize Palestinian independence and respect the Palestinian right to self-determination.
Signed:
Chancellor Rafael Mercado
Israeli Court of Justice
Winner of Case:
United States of Enotita
Case closed on 28 February 2024.
No comments:
Post a Comment